[Table of Contents]


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ARSCLIST] Lossy compression losing quality (was Re: [ARSCLIST] Pristine Audio and the Milllennials . . .)



And I still wonder whether one, particularly I, can tell the difference.

Howard

Hi Howard,
I have 13,000 songs on my iPod, all ripped in AAC at 128kBs. They sound just fine to me, and the convenience of having that vast library at my fingertips is worth any percieved loss in quality, as I do most of my iPod listening in the car.
On the other hand, when I do my archiving work, I transfer at 24/44.1, ultimately delivering 16bit CDRs and 24/44.1 BWF files on DVD and/or hard drives. The reason for this is to preserve the highest fidelity from the original analog source. The ultimate destination for the material may be CDRs or mp3s or whatever, but the idea is to have a high quality digital preservation master to go back to if necessary.
When I take off my preservationist hat and put on my record collector hat, I find my priorities change somewhat. One of my favorite things to do is to clean a record on my Keith Monks record cleaner, and and listen to it while I record it into my computer. One of my least favorite things to do is to go back to those records on the hard drive and edit and name all of the tracks on the records, top and tail them, run them through some scratch removal software, normalize them and convert them into mp3s (with tags), so I end up with lots of whole albums, as 1 big wav file, sitting on the drive that I can't access as quickly or easily as my CDs in iTunes. I plan to eventually do these things of course, but for now, it's comforting to know I have copies of the records in a semi-secure location. If the drive dies, I still have the records, already cleaned, to go back to, and I don't have to play them again unless I want to.
When I started listening to recorded music, it was on a transistor AM radio, and then a Sony AM/FM clock-radio. My first record player was a Califone (the kind you used to see in the classroom, with the button you push down to stop the record). When I got a Sansui reciever and some Bose speakers after high school, I thought that was the bees knees!
That was around the time I started taking better care of my records.
In all of those scenarios, I loved the music I heard. A great song is a great song, whether it's on an SACD or an AM radio. Nowadays, it seems one can buy into this music thing at varying levels of quality. Most are perfectly happy with fair-to-good mp3 encoding for most scenarios, but then there those who percieve higher quality, and crave it.
I say if it sounds good to you, it is good. If you are transferring stuff for your own enjoyment, transfer it at the highest quality that makes sense for your scenario. If you are doing stuff that is unique, or particularly rare, give a thought to higher sampling rates for a preservation copy.
As you noted, the wav file for any given piece of audio is going to be about 10 times bigger than a 128k mp3, so if you want lots of stuff in a small space, mp3 makes sense. When I got my first (30 gig) iPod, I filled it up with wav files, and had about 700 songs. Then I converted all ot the wavs to mp3s and got about 6000 songs. That's a lot more songs!
On my computer, I have many removable drives, and I can add more as I need them at relatively low cost, so I see no need to compress the audio I store on them. Unfortunately, hard drives are not the safest place to store data over time, and with ever-increasing drive size, we have the potential for bigger crashes. I think the average consumer doesn't worry about the longevity of the drive holding all those family photos, and videos of the wedding or whatever.
When I'm working on a project, I have multiple copies of everything saved on multiple removable drives, and after a while, that storage space really starts to add up. For my own stuff, it's worth 4-500 to be able to store a terrabyte of audio, but another 4-500 for a backup drive.. gives me pause. The main thing though is that I have all of that stuff *somewhere else* if I need to go back to it. I had all my records in a storage locker for 5 years, and couldn't play one of them if I wanted to (which was frequently, and very frustrating). Eventually, I will be able to carry them around with me in my pocket. Wow! What is more valuable to me?
I wonder about my niece and nephew (ages 7-8). With the boundless choices that now exist, what are they going to choose to listen to (when they are given a choice)? Right now they are hooked on American Idol, and love to listen to the performers they know from there. Their father plays the guitar, and they both seem to display some interest in it, so I'm giving them both mini stratocasters for christmas, so hopefully they can learn about making their own music.


Sorry to ramble so..
-Matt Sohn



[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]