Re: [ARSCLIST] Record Business vs. Music Business: The Shakeout Continues.

[D P Ingram <darren@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 23 maj 2007, at 05.12, Steven C. Barr(x) wrote:

> Scary fact: The CRIA, which essentially functions as a "lap dog" of
> the RRIA south of the border, has been suggesting a "longer" (no
> specific term mentioned...) term for sound-recording copyrights!
> As well, the current Federal government is infatuated with the
> US Of A...

I am more and more drawn, presently, to the idea that (if desired)  
people who have used the database I am developing can elect to make  
their own collection "available" and then collector X can take  
contact with collector Y and discuss their collection in more  
detail... that makes it less "stressful" legally.

And if someone should develop a similar service for the audio, one  
could come to terms that they use the database information and  
somehow it is cross referenced to their own audio library element.

> Assuming, of course, that there exist folks who want to hear some of
> the really BAD items...?!?!
A change can be nice ... random samples and allthat.


---
Darren Ingram (darren at ingram.fi / www.ingram.fi)
Provider of many things including research, media, innovation and  
consultancy services.

"Insert pointless, humo(u)rless quotation and ASCII art here"
"Insert lengthy, boring and meaningless corporate and copyright  
disclaimer here"