[Table of Contents]


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ARSCLIST] Best Software Noise Reduction Algorithms?



Hello,

I found that Pinnacle Steinberg Clean! 5.0 has rather good and well sounding noise reduction implementation via usual fingerprints. I never managed to tweak Sony Noise Reduction to sound good - OK, no audible artifacts but it "washes" sound.

Algoritmix has rather good noise reducers, but not of that PRO version (that is so hard to knob properly, and can occupied even the strongest CPUs and sound cards), but theirs simplier version - Sound Laundry. Also DCArt, if used correctly and with not so much "enthusism" mentioned/described in tutorial for this program.

I was dissapointed wih newest Waves Z-noise, deeply.

I never tired to work with NoNoise or CEDAR. Suppose, they are years better then those I mentioned, but God knows. Only direct comparison can tell.

It would be nice for someone to do that comparison.

Best wishes,
Milan


----- Original Message ----- From: "DSL FODA01" <foda01@xxxxxxxx>
To: <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2006 8:53 PM
Subject: [ARSCLIST] Best Software Noise Reduction Algorithms?



Hello all,

I am just getting into transfering my collection of 78's to digital. I have
an Audio Technica AT-PL120 turntable with a stanton 500 cartridge and 2.7
mil eliptical stylus. (I'm sure this setup could be improved upon but the
styli are expensive and I'm on a somewhat limited budget.)


I am running into a custom made preamp and then into my computer's
soundcard.

I am using Goldwave 5.12 to record the audio and perform the editing/noise
reduction.  What I am wondering is whether there is a better sounding
noise-reduction algorithm out there that I could be using.

The NR that Goldwave has can be configured and I am on the highest quality
settings but if I mix it at 100% the noise goes away but the remaining
signal sounds mechanical and echoey. The best compromise is to set the mix
at about 35% and live with some of the noise but I wonder if a more complex
FFT or something like that with a better filter algorithm would be able to
catch more of the noise while still leaving more of the original sound
intact, or at least not sound so mechanical.


If anyone has some experience using Goldwave or other software I would
appreciate your comments.


thanks,


Dave


[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]