[Table of Contents]


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ARSCLIST] [OffList] creating access cd's



At 10:10 PM 1/27/2006, steven c wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard L. Hess" <arclists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Audio (red book) CDs that are available for general patron use under
> the normal terms of such use for sound recordings (i.e. listened to
> in the listening room, taken home, etc).
>
> They are nothing more than a disposable copy of the asset. This
> distinguishes them from a preservation copy which is a surrogate for
> the real original which is decaying or may become unplayable for
> other reasons.
>
> You can have more than one access copy and you can have more than one
> preservation copy.
>
> The access copy is essentially sacrificial - it gets used and cared
> for, but if something bad happens, who really cares.
>
> The preservation copies are used only for making additional access copies.
>
> Preservation copies don't have to be Red Book CDs even if the access
> copies are.
>
Isn't all of this copying violating the copyrights on sound recordings
(assuming a commercial CD is involved? If so, aren't the institutions
involved risking the arath of RIAA?!

Steven,


There are millions (and millions?) of hours of recordings in archives that have nothing to do with RIAA.

My statements above assume that the library/archive has the right to do this. They do for their oral histories and other non-commercial holdings.

Cheers,

Richard


[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]