[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ARSCLIST] ARSCLIST Digest - NAB vs. DIN recordings
Hello Richard,
although my experience is not from North America
but from Sweden, I thought you might be
interested in what I found as regards Butterfly
heads.
Between 2000 and 2003 I took part in a digitizing
effort with Universal Music's archive here, and I
quote from an article I prepared for IASA: "The
Butterfly heads were predominantly CCIR (67%)
while the full-track tapes were predominantly NAB
(84%). The two-track recordings were more evenly
distributed, with 47% CCIR and 51% NAB." (Eq that
is)
This was from a selection of more than 4.300
tapes, mostly 1/4", recorded at 15 ips. For the
two-track recordings, I don't know if they were
Ampex or NAB "standard", since we had no way to
measure such small differences. We did play back
the full-track tapes with Butterfly heads and
avoided that head for the two-track tapes. Our
machines were Studer A812's.
Greetings,
Tommy
--
Tommy Sjöberg
The Centre for Swedish Folk Music and Jazz Research
Stockholm, Sweden