[Table of Contents]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ARSCLIST] Whacky-Packia outed for what it is -- Amateur Hour in Siberia

   You're just a cynic.  Jack

----- Original Message ----- From: "Steven C. Barr(x)" <stevenc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2007 12:06 AM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Whacky-Packia outed for what it is -- Amateur Hour in Siberia

----- Original Message ----- From: "Jack Palmer" <vdalhart@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Steven ,
I disagree. There are publications that are probably totally accurate
in their major facts but certainly have typos and minor errors. As a person
who spent years researching a lot of erroneous material, I can assure you
that some things are as accurate as possible. Jack

Well, having been deeply involved in discographic research for over three
decades, and having compiled a standard reference work in that field...I
disagree with your disagreement! First, there exists NO reference work...
paper, digital, whatever...that contains (1) ALL the facts regarding its
subject...and (2) presents those facts with absolute accuracy! You even
admit to "typos and minor errors"...and any/all of these represent
variances from actual facts!

Further, ANY reference work should...in fact, MUST...be subtitled
"Insofar as is currently known!" There is always, lurking somewhere
just out of sight, that as-yet-unexamined source which will provide
newer and more accurate data, as well as blowing previous works on
the subject into a cocked hat!

Even "official documents" usually represent NOT the actual facts, but
the facts as reinterpreted and/or altered to substantiate whatever
the writer was trying to have his/her/its superiors believe had

Steven C. Barr

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]