[Table of Contents]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Fwd: BOUNCE arsclist@ats.rochester.edu: Non-member


What are Pellon wipes?

Harry Rice
Berea College
Subject: Fwd: BOUNCE arsclist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:    Non-member    sub
From:    <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> at berlink
Date:    5/11/2001  9:20 AM

>Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 12:36:56 -0700
>To: Language Laboratories and Archives <language-labs@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>From: "Richard L. Hess" <richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: arsclist sticky shed
>Cc: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Hi, Barbara,
>There are resources on my Web page at http://www.richardhess.com/tape/
>I think at least some of these people deal with sticky shed syndrome.
>VidiPax does it by wiping with Pellon wipes, most of the rest of us bake.
>I've had good results with a whole heap'o'tapes but it's never guaranteed
>and while we all take the utmost care we cannot be held liable for loss of
>the master--I think that's pretty standard.
>If it's only one reel I could look at it for you. If it's much more than
>that, I don't have the time. $100 hour is close to the going rate (I think
>VidiPax charges $95). That's per hour of studio time not per running hour
>of program. My general estimate is that it takes from 4-10x depending on
>what needs to be done and how good you want it. The 6x is typically
>finessing individual dropouts--you've got to find them which means
>listening and watching.
>What is the tape format, what is the tape brand,  how long is it? What's on
>it? what do you want to do with the content?
>I see you're from the language labs. If it's just word and it's a
>continuous tape (no splices) it might not even take 4x. If it is music with
>lots of splices for CD re-release, It generally approaches the 10x figure.
>I've done reel tapes as early as 1947 with some Bing Crosby excerpts on
>them (no sticky shed, but lots of problems) but most of my current work is
>centered on folk music from the 70's and 80's when sticky-shed was at its
>Good luck finding someone to do it!
>At 01:12 PM 05/10/2001 -0500, Language Laboratories and Archives wrote:
> >Hi, We just had a case of sticky shed, and the company we dealt with many
> >years ago is no longer in business. Who are you all working with?
> >
> >Barbara Need
> >UChicago--Language Labs
> >-
> >For subscription instructions, see the ARSC home page
> >http://www.arsc-audio.org/arsclist.html
> >Copyright of individual posting is owned by the author of the posting and
> >permission to re-transmit or publish a post must be secured
> >from the author of the post.

For subscription instructions, see the ARSC home page
Copyright of individual posting is owned by the author of the posting and
permission to re-transmit or publish a post must be secured
from the author of the post.

Received: from popmail.berea.edu [] by smtpgtwy.berea.edu (ccMail Link to SMTP R8.31.00.5)
	; Fri, 11 May 2001 09:36:20 -0400
Return-Path: <owner-ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from galileo.cc.rochester.edu ( by popmail.berea.edu
 with SMTP (Eudora Internet Mail Server 2.2.2); Fri, 11 May 2001 09:37:14 -0400
Received: (from majord@localhost)
	by galileo.cc.rochester.edu (8.10.1/8.10.1) id f4BDM7M23805
	for arsclist-outgoing; Fri, 11 May 2001 09:22:07 -0400 (EDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: galileo.cc.rochester.edu: majord set sender to owner-ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Message-Id: <>
X-Sender: esth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2
Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 09:20:19 -0400
To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Esther Gillie <esth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Fwd: BOUNCE arsclist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:    Non-member
  submission from ["Richard L. Hess" <richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]   
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Sender: owner-ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]