Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 12:36:56 -0700
To: Language Laboratories and Archives <language-labs@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Richard L. Hess" <richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: arsclist sticky shed
There are resources on my Web page at http://www.richardhess.com/tape/
I think at least some of these people deal with sticky shed syndrome.
VidiPax does it by wiping with Pellon wipes, most of the rest of us bake.
I've had good results with a whole heap'o'tapes but it's never guaranteed
and while we all take the utmost care we cannot be held liable for loss of
the master--I think that's pretty standard.
If it's only one reel I could look at it for you. If it's much more than
that, I don't have the time. $100 hour is close to the going rate (I think
VidiPax charges $95). That's per hour of studio time not per running hour
of program. My general estimate is that it takes from 4-10x depending on
what needs to be done and how good you want it. The 6x is typically
finessing individual dropouts--you've got to find them which means
listening and watching.
What is the tape format, what is the tape brand, how long is it? What's on
it? what do you want to do with the content?
I see you're from the language labs. If it's just word and it's a
continuous tape (no splices) it might not even take 4x. If it is music with
lots of splices for CD re-release, It generally approaches the 10x figure.
I've done reel tapes as early as 1947 with some Bing Crosby excerpts on
them (no sticky shed, but lots of problems) but most of my current work is
centered on folk music from the 70's and 80's when sticky-shed was at its
Good luck finding someone to do it!
At 01:12 PM 05/10/2001 -0500, Language Laboratories and Archives wrote:
>Hi, We just had a case of sticky shed, and the company we dealt with many
>years ago is no longer in business. Who are you all working with?
>For subscription instructions, see the ARSC home page
>Copyright of individual posting is owned by the author of the posting and
>permission to re-transmit or publish a post must be secured
>from the author of the post.