Re: [ARSCLIST] Re print-thru

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Re print-thru
From: Lou Judson <inaudio@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 08:39:02 -0700
In-reply-to: <49D4D96B.3050501@verizon.net>
List-archive: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>
List-help: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV?body=INFO ARSCLIST>
List-owner: <mailto:ARSCLIST-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-subscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
Message-id: <3725345B-844F-4888-ADD9-DA74286EC788@sonic.net>
References: <85A19E13-059D-47C0-AB85-4AFFB943CD97@att.net> <49D4D96B.3050501@verizon.net>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>

Tightness of the pack depends on adjustment of the machine! My Studer packs tighter on playback than on library wind, I think. I prefer a tighter wind as I dont'; seem to have print through problems as a general rule.

Richard Hess, what is proper for tension on wind vs playback?
<L>
Lou Judson • Intuitive Audio
415-883-2689

On Apr 2, 2009, at 8:27 AM, Aaron Levinson wrote:

Actually my experience has been that you should never run and store the tape in any shuttle mode as the tape is wound much tighter and this increases print through. The suggestion for storage has been tails out played in real time. The real time speed does not pack the wind as tightly.

AA

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Re print-thru
  - From: Prentice, Will

References:
- [ARSCLIST] Re print-thru
  - From: Doug Pomeroy
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Re print-thru
  - From: Aaron Levinson

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Re print-thru
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Re print-thru
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Re print-thru
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Re print-thru
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] Re print-thru

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]