Re: [ARSCLIST] Weight of LPs

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Weight of LPs
From: Mike Richter <mrichter@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 17:53:15 -0800
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
In-reply-to: <003501c70144$196c99a0$0100007f@sympatico.ca>
List-archive: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>
List-help: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV?body=INFO ARSCLIST>
List-owner: <mailto:ARSCLIST-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-subscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
Message-id: <454E958B.106@cpl.net>
References: <yam10535.1685.170819976@smtp.ntlworld.com> <003501c70144$196c99a0$0100007f@sympatico.ca>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909)

Steven C. Barr(x) wrote:

So, a jacketed LP weighs about the same as (or slightly more than)
a 10" 78. One wonders if the ultra-thin LP's of the seventies
weigh significantly less than their earlier counterparts...?

Steven C. Barr

Yes, it is noticeably lighter. However, other factors come into play as well including the insert, the weight of the jacket, and any box or other supplementary material.

Mike
--
mrichter@xxxxxxx
http://www.mrichter.com/

References:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Weight of LPs
  - From: Don Cox
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Weight of LPs
  - From: Steven C. Barr(x)

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Weight of LPs
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Boxing and shipping LPs, was Weight of LPs
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Weight of LPs
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Weight of LPs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] Weight of LPs

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]