[Table of Contents]


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ARSCLIST] discography of "direct-to-disk revival"?



This is just a reinforcement of the idea that the most vulnerable places in the audio chain are those points where one type of energy is changed to another...the tranducer. Mechanical to electonic (cartridge, speaker), tape to disc (magnetic to electronic to mechanical). I expect this is old news.

Steve Smolian

----- Original Message ----- From: "phillip holmes" <insuranceman@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 10:26 PM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] discography of "direct-to-disk revival"?



I had an interesting argument with a tape devotee about tape VS disk and one thing he never understood was how much is lost when you go from one medium to another. The weakness of tape is the strength of vinyl and vice versa. He felt that tape was always superior. I agreed that a properly aligned deck with good tape stock, run at 15ips (or higher), with maximum numbers of tracks allowed at 1 track per 1/8th inch, could smoke most recording methods and should be better than "direct to disk". But, with D2D, you skip a whole set of electronics, storage and degradation. A record won't beat a 1st generation master tape on capability. But, if you have the opportunity to skip that tape generation, you skip all the distortion introduced by the tape head amps, tape head, storage, playback head, playback electronics and the extra cables and connections. In other words, it's apples VS oranges. If vinyl is your media of choice, direct to disk will maximize the potential because it eliminates distortions you don't have to have.
Phillip
FWIW, I think D2D is spectacular. "The King James Version" is pretty close to being there.


Tom Fine wrote:
Hi All:

Was there ever published a discography or listing of all of the direct-to-disk revival LPs? That was a short-lived fad but there were some great-sounding records made. I have just a handful but I imagine there were maybe a couple hundred made.

I would argue that some of those recordings were as good as vinyl could get. It was an interesting time in the recording business because some of the great old-school engineers were still around in top form and there were still jazz and classical artists who could nail it live in the studio in one take, and the studios were past the early and mid 70's "dead coffin" acoustics. Plus that generation of mixing consoles sounded good again in most cases.

Interesting -- in a couple of cases I later bought the CD, which was obviously made from a tape run at the time. You can really tell how Dolby A NR on the tape quashes the sound, even when a good CD mastering job was done.

-- Tom Fine




--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.6/453 - Release Date: 9/20/2006




[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]