Re: [ARSCLIST] .BWF implementation

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] .BWF implementation
From: Graeme Jaye <graemejaye@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 23:38:54 +0200
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
In-reply-to: <44DCC73A.8070500@vermontfolklifecenter.org>
List-archive: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>
List-help: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV?body=INFO ARSCLIST>
List-owner: <mailto:ARSCLIST-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-subscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
Message-id: <1244198402.20060811233854@iname.com>
References: <38047D1AC7FE9C4B9F9B780A13EF022D553CFA@iu-mssg-mbx103.ads.iu.edu> <44DCC73A.8070500@vermontfolklifecenter.org>
Reply-to: Graeme Jaye <graemejaye@xxxxxxxxx>

Hi Andy

On 11/08/2006 you wrote;

ak> I've got an Audition 2.0 upgrade waiting around for funding to
ak> purchase a new machine (it's XP only), so I don't know if this
ak> latest version covers it either.

Since nobody else has answered, I can tell you it does :) .

Graeme Jaye

graemejaye@xxxxxxxxx

Audio Restoration
http://www.personal-cd.com

Hobby Musician - find some of my stuff here
http://www.indiehitz.net/html/bands/19/

References:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] .BWF implementation
  - From: Casey, Michael T
- Re: [ARSCLIST] .BWF implementation
  - From: andy kolovos

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] 5" discs more hardy than some think
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] J Folksay records label vs. Stinson records
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] .BWF implementation
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] .BWF implementation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] .BWF implementation

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]