Re: [ARSCLIST] Stereo records.

[Robert Hodge <rjhodge@xxxxxxx>]

But then again , the audiotioning players in the record store booths
weren't exactly Hi Fi, come to think of it.
bh

>>> rjhodge@xxxxxxx 6/19/2006 5:36 PM >>>
And reproduced through a pair of 3 inch speakers 10 inches apart at
each
booth. 70 volt lines.

AARGH !

bh  

>>> thorenstd124@xxxxxxxxx 6/19/2006 5:16 PM >>>
There was a 2" plastic adaptor that you could buy to snap your 3" CD
singles into.I sold a 3" CD single,last year,on evilBay,of George
Harrison's "When We Was Fab", still sealed,in a skinny little
longbox.Got a decent price too,if I recall.
   I do recall seeing CD jukeboxes,starting about 1987,or so.I don't
see them around much anymore.
    As for the 7" stereo "mini-Lps",they are not all Roger
Williams,and
The Ray Charles Singers.There is quite a bit of soul/R&B,from
Atlantic,Motown,ABC-Paramount, RCA,and King,all of it in stereo.I have
a
number of these.They seem to start about 1963.The oldest rock one I
own,is a Searchers,from 1965.I also seem to recall seeing a Ventures
"Telstar/Lonely Bull",years ago.They are all highly collectible.
  Roger Kulp

David Lennick <dlennick@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
  steven c wrote:

>
>
> LP's first emerged as a major format (versus singles) around
1966-67...
> primarily due to the immense popularity of the Beatles' "Sgt.
Pepper's..."
> LP, and the fact that it was probably the first popular/"rock" album
to
> be reviewed by major record/music critics.
>
> However, the single record (available only as a 45, except for a
> handful of 33-1/3 singles intended for jukebox use) remained, and
> was the standard format for AM radio, until at least the early
> 1990's (as I recall, that was the last time I saw 45 singles
> being sold in record stores...and they were being dumped at
> bargain prices).
>
> What "put the kibosh" on singles was the replacement of the analog
> record by the digital CD. There was some experimentation with CD
> singles, but they were the same physical size as CD albums...so
> buyers felt they were being "ripped off" by several songs...and
> didn't buy the dommed things!

There were also smaller-size CDs, which were a nuisance because they
required an
adapter. I still have one around here..it came in a normal-sized CD
sleeve from
EMI and held a 3" sample disc, the point of which is still lost on me,
and one
manufacturer actually did put out a 3" CD in a small sleeve,
containing
only
Ravel's Bolero (the 1930 recording supposedly conducted by the
composer).

>
>
> However, at the same time, the other idea that failed was jukeboxes
> offering complete albums (but for a higher price than one song).
> The consumers were so used to putting a nickel(/dime/quarter) in
> and hearing their favourite song, the idea of playing an entire
> album for several of them just never caught on...as well, if
> jukeboxes played entire albums, imagine how long you would have
> to wait until your selection was played?!

Weren't those so-called "albums" actually 33RPM 7" discs containing 3
tracks per
side? I also have a number of 33rpm juke box singles with ONE stereo
track per
side, along with 7-inch album slicks to display in the juke box. I'm
sure
patrons couldn't wait to listen to Roger Williams and the Ray Charles
Singers in
stereo while they downed their cheeseburgers.

dl


 		
---------------------------------
New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC and
save big.