[Table of Contents]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ARSCLIST] Ampex 456

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Ampex 456
From: Lou Judson <loujudson@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 18:51:36 -0700
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
In-reply-to: <7.0.1.0.2.20060616211647.050b28e0@richardhess.com>
List-archive: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>
List-help: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV?body=INFO ARSCLIST>
List-owner: <mailto:ARSCLIST-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-subscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
Message-id: <e39b6f3c0a54cded9a2bdb3ba43efda7@mac.com>
References: <C0B8B043.2128F%parker@masterdigital.com> <7411916166ceb67af6dd1cff54172712@mac.com> <7.0.1.0.2.20060616211647.050b28e0@richardhess.com>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>

DO let us know if you get a reply - the wonderer wants to know.

Lou Judson • Intuitive Audio
415-883-2689

On Jun 16, 2006, at 6:18 PM, Richard L. Hess wrote:

3M may be better. I just asked about a batch number and haven't heard back.

References:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Ampex 456
  - From: Parker Dinkins
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Ampex 456
  - From: Lou Judson
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Ampex 456
  - From: Richard L. Hess

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Ampex 456 - tip of the iceberg...chemistry
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Stereo records.
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Ampex 456
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Ampex 456
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]