[Table of Contents]


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ARSCLIST] headphones revisited



I have a pair of the lower-priced Shure sound-blocking headphones, the E3c <http://www.shurestore.com/earphones/eseries_e3c.html>, and they sound great. They have allowed me to monitor at much, much lower levels --and they work great when you must record in the same room as your subject.

My only complaint is that, with time, the rubber sleeves become looser and tend to stay in your ear when you pop the headphones out --and it is quite annoying (and unnerving) to try to get the little sleeves out of your ear canal.

Marcos

--On Monday, May 15, 2006 6:47 PM -0700 Mike Richter <mrichter@xxxxxxx> wrote:

Tom Fine wrote:

Is there any science on the hearing-damage ramifications of these
noise-cancelling phones? Do they allow lower-SPL listening or are they
putting out more SPL to cancel outside noises?

I've seen no science on the subject and do not use Shure's product, but perhaps my experience with other models will be helpful.

The Philips phones I use provide both noise cancellation and signal
boost. The boost seems to be frequency-dependent, reaching perhaps 2 db
in the upper midrange. Noise reduction varies with the ambient noise but
seems to be in the neighborhood of 5 db. The phones begin a few db less
sensitive than typical over-the-ear models; I have not tried earbuds.

I suggest that on the bottom line these phones allow several db lower SPL
without sacrificing intelligibility. Since high fidelity and a noisy
environment are not consistent, the frequency shaping is not a drawback.
At the same time, they offer the opportunity for higher SPL due to their
signal boost, though like most players they run on a single 1.5-volt cell
so cannot peak higher than another headset of the same efficiency.

Mike
--
mrichter@xxxxxxx
http://www.mrichter.com/



Marcos http://tinyurl.com/kqdbk


[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]