Re: [ARSCLIST] Further thoughts on the new CLIR report. DVDs

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Further thoughts on the new CLIR report. DVDs
From: Karl Miller <lyaa071@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 08:55:23 -0600
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
In-reply-to: <000901c64f3c$be155920$47072046@DELLDOWNSTAIRS>
Message-id: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0603240851580.12149@larry.cc.utexas.edu>
References: <000901c64f3c$be155920$47072046@DELLDOWNSTAIRS>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>

On Fri, 24 Mar 2006, Steven Smolian wrote:

> It follows that archivally-intended projects for which the final storage
medium is the DVD should also be preserved at 44.1/16 on gold CDs until there
is a gold DVD on the market.

I believe MAM makes an "archival" Gold DVD-R which sells for about $90 for
fifty.

However, I still support the notion of the 44.1/16 gold 650MB disc backup
because of the availability and standardization of the playback modality.

Karl

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Further thoughts on the new CLIR report. DVDs
  - From: Steven Smolian
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Further thoughts on the new CLIR report. DVDs
  - From: Joe_Iraci

References:
- [ARSCLIST] Further thoughts on the new CLIR report. DVDs
  - From: Steven Smolian

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Did you know ...
Next by Date: [ARSCLIST] Cataloing recordings
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Further thoughts on the new CLIR report. DVDs
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Further thoughts on the new CLIR report. DVDs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] Further thoughts on the new CLIR report. DVDs

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]