Re: [ARSCLIST] Risk assessment tool Q3--DAT

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Risk assessment tool Q3--DAT
From: Lou Judson <loujudson@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 19:13:06 -0800
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
In-reply-to: <7.0.0.16.2.20060110181849.0cb25b40@richardhess.com>
Message-id: <fc241930fab30b06fa32ea56da3cc873@mac.com>
References: <C636A37544842F429873A2A35AA8621502771957@iu-mssg-mbx07.exchange.iu.edu> <7.0.0.16.2.20060110181849.0cb25b40@richardhess.com>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>

From my experience, not much of it recent: My main DAT deck has always been a Sony (2300) and I have found that it plays DATs recorded on virtually all kinds of recorders effortlessly, while several Panasonic 3700s really prefer DATS recorded on their own kind. However, I keep a 3500 near to hand just in case. I've observed that Panasonics require regular adjustment while at least my Sony has only needed one alignment in its nearly 15 years life. Will there be any NOS heads when the time comes? Rhetorical question...

<L>

Lou Judson • Intuitive Audio
415-883-2689

On Jan 10, 2006, at 3:22 PM, Richard L. Hess wrote:

5. Playback compatibility problems between machines?
Probable.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Risk assessment tool Q3--DAT
  - From: David Lennick

References:
- [ARSCLIST] Risk assessment tool Q3--DAT
  - From: Casey, Michael T
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Risk assessment tool Q3--DAT
  - From: Richard L. Hess

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] A Christmas Carol - reissues
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] A Christmas Carol - reissues
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Risk assessment tool Q3--DAT
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Risk assessment tool Q3--DAT
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] Risk assessment tool Q3--DAT

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]