[Table of Contents]


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ARSCLIST] ruminations on the ARSClist-was: message board vs. listserv



Brandon,

I would be happy to see the list move to a message board format (and as someone mentioned earlier, one that could be set up to notify of new posts).

We attempted this within the ARSC TC, and went back to a mail list at the request of several of the members of the committee. Ironically, one of the items that we have discussed within the TC is the great wealth of information that presents itself to the readers of the list, yet it is not easily searchable (and quite often, many "nuggets" of valuable information are buried under a topic that would not lend itself to easy identification). A "gathering place" for this invaluable information would be (in my opinion) a great resource to the ARSC community.

Please do not view my comments as an "official" response from the TC, it is just my observation of the discussion that you started yesterday. Message boards tend to suffer from some misconceptions ("I have to log in every time", "I don't know when somebody posts", etc.) that really aren't the case these days. Individual topics (and the commentary that follows) would be much clearer to the eye if set up properly.

I'm one of those people who will open EVERY message....just to make sure that I didn't miss something.

Best Regards,
John

John Spencer
www.bridgemediasolutions.com


On Dec 13, 2005, at 3:09 PM, Brandon Burke wrote:


Thanks David and others. Good points, all.

More than anything, I suppose I was trying to get a handle on how *active* most list members are -- not only as contributors but as readers as well. I for one, will admit to deleting most posts but, to David's point, and owing to the diverse membership of ARSC, not all threads will appeal to all members.

Fair enough.

In the interests of honesty, I should say that most replies in favor of the current listserv system are from highly active contributors. This would include, but is not limited to, folks who spend a generous amount of time at digital workstations, (presumably) making them more likely receive ARSClist messages "as they happen". To the contrary, at least one member mentioned that trying to catch up to the list, in cases where one has been away from the computer for expended periods of time, is next to impossible.

Another point: Because most replies in favor of keeping a listserv came from active contributors, it is perhaps not surprising that there was little mention of the cumbersome search function and the fact that one must click each individual post as s/he browses though a conversation in the online archives. (The solution being the ability to view threads as entire "conversations" rather than isolated emails.)

I guess the question is, how much are we tailoring this thing to our own needs and conveniences vs. perhaps making the list's contents easier to navigate for the greater archival/collector/ discographer/etc community? No, this is not a rhetorical question. I'm asking because an answer in either direction will, in turn, answer almost all of my questions above.

Seems we're providing a bountiful wealth of knowledge to the public...provided they're wiling to cross a swamp to get it. (Again, this goes back to the question about whom our target audiences are for these posts.)

again thanks,
Brandon



_______________________________________
Brandon Burke
Assistant Archivist for Audiovisual Collections
Hoover Institution Archives
Stanford University
Stanford, CA 94305-6010
voice: 650.724.9711
fax: 650.725.3445
email: burke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]