Re: [ARSCLIST] message board vs. listserv

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] message board vs. listserv
From: andy Kolovos <akolovos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 19:48:41 -0500
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
In-reply-to: <5.1.0.14.2.20051212133847.026879a0@hoover.stanford.edu>
Message-id: <3034.69.169.248.162.1134434921.squirrel@webmail.vermontfolklifecenter.org>
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20051212133847.026879a0@hoover.stanford.edu>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>
User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.4

> Curious as to how many list members might prefer a message board format
> over the standard email listserv currently in place.

100% listserv.

I've got lots of time during the day to scan message subjects and either
read or delete email as it arrives.

I've got zero time during the day to visit and pour over a message board.

Email comes to me. I've got to go to a message board.  I'm quite happy
with things as they are.

andy

-- 
Andy Kolovos
Archivist/Folklorist
Vermont Folklife Center
www.vermontfolklifecenter.org
akolovos @ vermontfolklifecenter.org

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] message board vs. listserv
  - From: stevenc
- [ARSCLIST] ruminations on the ARSClist-was: message board vs. listserv
  - From: David Seubert

References:
- [ARSCLIST] message board vs. listserv
  - From: Brandon Burke

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Acostic playback
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] message board vs. listserv
Previous by thread: [ARSCLIST] message board vs. listserv
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] message board vs. listserv
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] message board vs. listserv

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]