Re: [ARSCLIST] Another on-line audio resource

[Steven Smolian <smolians@xxxxxxxxx>]

That's music copyright, not recording copyright.

Steve Smolian

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Lennick" <dlennick@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 11:45 PM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Another on-line audio resource


> Musical compositions were cut off at 1924, and that was to prevent 
> Rhapsody In
> Blue from falling into PD.
>
> dl
>
> Steven Smolian wrote:
>
> > A myth.  See the new CLIR study I cited earlier today.
> >
> > Steve Smolian
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Mike Richter" <mrichter@xxxxxxx>
> > To: <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 11:08 PM
> > Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Another on-line audio resource
> >
> > > David Seubert wrote:
> > >> I wonder why 1924? If it is all Mozart the underlying works are 
> > >> clearly
> > >> in the public domain no matter what the age of the recording. Nothing
> > >> changed in 1924 with respect to copyright on sound recordings (or more
> > >> properly, the lack thereof).
> > >>
> > >> David Seubert
> > >> UCSB
> > >
> > > The predominant opinion is that American copyright protects all sound
> > > recordings fixed before 1924 - though I'm not sure of those from 1923.
> > >
> > > Mike
> > > --
> > > mrichter@xxxxxxx
> > > http://www.mrichter.com/
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > > Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.13.13/197 - Release Date: 
> > > 12/9/2005
> > >
> > >
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.13.13/195 - Release Date: 12/8/2005