Re: [ARSCLIST] Another on-line audio resource

[Steven Smolian <smolians@xxxxxxxxx>]

A myth.  See the new CLIR study I cited earlier today.

Steve Smolian



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mike Richter" <mrichter@xxxxxxx>
To: <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 11:08 PM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Another on-line audio resource


> David Seubert wrote:
> > I wonder why 1924? If it is all Mozart the underlying works are clearly 
> > in the public domain no matter what the age of the recording. Nothing 
> > changed in 1924 with respect to copyright on sound recordings (or more 
> > properly, the lack thereof).
> >
> > David Seubert
> > UCSB
>
> The predominant opinion is that American copyright protects all sound 
> recordings fixed before 1924 - though I'm not sure of those from 1923.
>
> Mike
> --
> mrichter@xxxxxxx
> http://www.mrichter.com/
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.13.13/197 - Release Date: 12/9/2005