[Table of Contents]


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ARSCLIST] Another on-line audio resource



A myth. See the new CLIR study I cited earlier today.

Steve Smolian



----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Richter" <mrichter@xxxxxxx>
To: <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 11:08 PM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Another on-line audio resource



David Seubert wrote:
I wonder why 1924? If it is all Mozart the underlying works are clearly in the public domain no matter what the age of the recording. Nothing changed in 1924 with respect to copyright on sound recordings (or more properly, the lack thereof).

David Seubert
UCSB

The predominant opinion is that American copyright protects all sound recordings fixed before 1924 - though I'm not sure of those from 1923.


Mike
--
mrichter@xxxxxxx
http://www.mrichter.com/


-- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.13.13/197 - Release Date: 12/9/2005




[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]