Re: [ARSCLIST] Another on-line audio resource

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Another on-line audio resource
From: Mike Richter <mrichter@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 20:08:45 -0800
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
In-reply-to: <439A48A5.2040201@library.ucsb.edu>
Message-id: <439A54CD.8060508@cpl.net>
References: <439A1739.10005@cpl.net> <439A48A5.2040201@library.ucsb.edu>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923)

David Seubert wrote:

I wonder why 1924? If it is all Mozart the underlying works are clearly in the public domain no matter what the age of the recording. Nothing changed in 1924 with respect to copyright on sound recordings (or more properly, the lack thereof).
David Seubert
UCSB

The predominant opinion is that American copyright protects all sound recordings fixed before 1924 - though I'm not sure of those from 1923.

Mike
--
mrichter@xxxxxxx
http://www.mrichter.com/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Another on-line audio resource
  - From: stevenc
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Another on-line audio resource
  - From: David Seubert
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Another on-line audio resource
  - From: Steven Smolian

References:
- [ARSCLIST] Another on-line audio resource
  - From: Mike Richter
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Another on-line audio resource
  - From: David Seubert

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Met Opera Reocrd Club - was "Other memorable record stores"
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Other memorable record stores
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Another on-line audio resource
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Another on-line audio resource
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] Another on-line audio resource

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]