Re: [ARSCLIST] Mastering to WAV

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Mastering to WAV
From: Language Laboratories and Archives <language-labs@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 13:12:48 -0600
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>, ARSCLIST@sun8.LOC.GOV
In-reply-to: <43970DDD.3070704@avocadoproductions.com>
Message-id: <p06230906bfbce4681abc@[128.135.228.73]>
References: <002401c5fb3b$f512cf20$0700a8c0@paramarupa> <43970DDD.3070704@avocadoproductions.com>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>

Or you expect the audio to be used for phonetic analysis.

At 9:29 -0700 07/12/05, Angie Dickinson Mickle wrote:

There is no need to use 48K in your situation unless this is audio for video.


Barbara Need
Manager (SS4), Computer Support, Archivist

References:
- [ARSCLIST] Mastering to WAV
  - From: Paul Tombleson
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Mastering to WAV
  - From: Angie Dickinson Mickle