Re: [ARSCLIST] MP3 bit rates and usage factors for Web pages

[seva <seva@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

At somepointinthepast, seva wrote:
> > LAME is optimized for 128. anything below that and it's terrible.

At 7:42 PM -0800 12/6/05, Mike Richter wrote:

> 1. Recent versions (in the past year or so) are reasonably good at 
> lower rates.
>
> 2. LAME optimization is for 11:1 compression,


ah! i'll check a newer implementation. i used Mpegger by Proteron.

and 11:1, so mono should be good at 64k....



--
all the best,
seva
mastering engineer
soundcurrent mastering

|| |  |   |     |        |             |                     |
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
++   the no-HTML plaintext email campaign, charter member   ++
++                           "ASCII and ye shall receive"   ++
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
|                     |             |        |     |   |  | ||