Re: [ARSCLIST] MP3 bit rates and usage factors for Web pages

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] MP3 bit rates and usage factors for Web pages
From: seva <seva@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 22:18:17 -0500
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>, ARSCLIST@sun8.loc.gov
In-reply-to: <001301c5fab7$e04a44d0$6501a8c0@tomofficenew>
Message-id: <p06110400bfbc04e9028f@[192.168.1.97]>
References: <164A9EB87F762541A5AC2D9858FF2BC0F60E5E@cmcc-mail.civilisations.ca> <001301c5fab7$e04a44d0$6501a8c0@tomofficenew>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>

At 5:53 PM -0500 12/6/05, Tom Fine wrote:

I have not had good results with LAME -- it's slow
and the sound is not great on my Windows boxes, with various front-ends
tried.

LAME is optimized for 128. anything below that and it's terrible.

--
w/best regards,
seva
mastering engineer
http://www.soundcurrent.com


|| |  |   |     |        |             |                     |
Things are not what they seem to be; nor are they otherwise.
  -- Lankavatara Sutra

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] MP3 bit rates and usage factors for Web pages
  - From: Mike Richter

References:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] MP3 bit rates and usage factors for Web pages
  - From: Colin Schlachta
- Re: [ARSCLIST] MP3 bit rates and usage factors for Web pages
  - From: Tom Fine