Re: [ARSCLIST] Mono CD transfer

["Richard L. Hess" <arclists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I strongly suggest against this approach. Most playback systems cannot easily
play one or the other channels.

There are safe (but not all are safe) 2-disc inserts for standard-width jewel
boxes. This solves many of the problems of only having 74 minutes on the disc.

One of the big problems are C90s or C120s--I just use one disc per side of the
cassette and the client gets back one jewel case for each cassette tape.

Cheers,

Richard
--

Richard L. Hess
http://www.richardhess.com/tape/


Quoting "Steven C. Barr" <stevenc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Robert Hodge" <rjhodge@xxxxxxx>
> > Which makes me think , is there such a thing as crosstalk ( or any of it's
> permutations ) on a CD,or any other digital format ?
> I can't see how there could be, unless it occured after the signal was
> converted to analog audio?
> > If  not , could one disc be used to store twice as much audio in a " half
> track " monaural mode ?  I realise that each independant channel would have
> to be transferred to each channel at the same time .
> >
> > Letting the imagination wander a bit.
> The easiest way to do this, AFAIK, would be to put the two signals on tape
> as an intermediate stage
> in creating the recording. It is very easy to put two totally different
> signals on left and right
> channels of a tape recording, and these could then be fed into the CD-R
> "burner" just like they
> were two parts of a normal stereo signal. The result would be records 1-20
> on the left channel,
> and records 21-40 on the right channel. Rather a mess if you tried to play
> it in stereo, though...
> Steven C. Barr
>