Re: arsclist Analog reformatting tape specs-Advice sought

To: <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: arsclist Analog reformatting tape specs-Advice sought
From: "Art Shifrin" <goldens2@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 16:09:27 -0500
Message-id: <002b01c19951$ef783dc0$6400a8c0@shiffy>
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020109122059.03438d50@mail.cadvision.com>
Reply-to: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

This is evidently the same  qty. 60 C120 project on which I've bid.    I've
proposed 7.5 ips on BASF 911 @ 7.5 ips full track.  Bidirectional and or
tapes made at a slower speed would ill-advised alternatives.

Best,
Shiffy

-
For subscription instructions, see the ARSC home page
http://www.arsc-audio.org/arsclist.html
Copyright of individual posting is owned by the author of the posting and
permission to re-transmit or publish a post must be secured
from the author of the post.

References:
- arsclist Analog reformatting tape specs-Advice sought
  - From: Richard L. Hess

Prev by Date: arsclist Analog reformatting tape specs-Advice sought
Next by Date: arsclist Fwd: submission from [Richard Warren <richard.warren@yale.edu>]
Previous by thread: Re: arsclist Analog reformatting tape specs-Advice sought
Next by thread: arsclist Fwd: submission from [Richard Warren <richard.warren@yale.edu>]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: arsclist Analog reformatting tape specs-Advice sought

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]