[Table of Contents]


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ARSCLIST] Some potential bad news ...



There has been misreporting of this proposal. It comes from McCreevy, who has clearly been got at. It does not come from the European Commission. If the Commission does endorse the proposal, it would then have to be backed by a majority of European Union member States and by the European Parliament. It is not a done deal. Also there has been quite a bit of corruption in the EU management over the years. Maybe McCreevy will be caught out and sent to jail!

Go to Google News, type in "copyright".

Meanwhile the UK government is contemplating legislation that will require ISPs to monitor users and drop those who download or share illegal music files. ISPs who failed to cooperate would be prosecuted and also required to disclose details of customers to the Courts. This legislation also certainly has an ulterior purpose which has nothing to do with downloads. However the ISPs will fight against it and they will probably win.

Democracy. What is that? It no longer exists in America and Europe, but there are vested interests on our side too.

It does make Marxism look attractive though, doesn't it? A society like China where everybody owns everything. And can sell it too. Want to buy the Brooklyn Bridge? How about a record from Naxos?

Don't panic.

SA

----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael H. Gray" <mhgray@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 7:18 PM
Subject: [ARSCLIST] Some potential bad news ...



Europe to extend music copyright
EC proposes extension to 95 years
By IAN MUNDELL
BRUSSELS - Plans to extend European performers' copyright protection
from 50 to 95 years will be put forward by the European Commission
before the summer.

The aim is to ensure that airplay royalties continue at least for the
lifetime of the performer, whether they are stars or unknown session
musicians.

Charlie McCreevy, the commissioner responsible, said Thursday that
record companies will be required to set up a fund reserving at least
20% of the income during the extended copyright term to session
musicians.

For featured artists, original advances would no longer be set off
against royalties in the extended term. The artist would get the lot.

The proposals will also contain a "use it or lose it" provision: if a
record company is unwilling to re-release a performance during the
extended term, the performer can move to another label.

The commission judges that its plan will not have a negative impact on
consumer prices, and that most of the additional revenue collected would
stay in Europe.


[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]