Re: [ARSCLIST] Pristine Audio (?!)

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Pristine Audio (?!)
From: Ward Duffield <wardd@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 17:54:40 -0500
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <002b01c837f8$6cf10110$7201a8c0@TOMOFFICE>
List-archive: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>
List-help: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV?body=INFO ARSCLIST>
List-owner: <mailto:ARSCLIST-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-subscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
Message-id: <CNEBLEBFEOHMLNIMAMCIOEMDDLAA.wardd@taconic.net>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>

-----Original Message-----
From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
[mailto:ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Tom Fine
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 6:09 AM
To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Pristine Audio (?!)

There's also a whole separate issue of not even knowing WHAT to use to hear
things properly.  Notice
in Mike Casey's report that a few pages are spent talking about "proper
listening environment."

Is there any consensus on cost-effective, accurate speakers?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Pristine Audio (?!)
  - From: Don Cox
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Pristine Audio (?!)
  - From: Tom Fine

References:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Pristine Audio (?!)
  - From: Tom Fine

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Audio History In a Nutshell?
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Pristine Audio (?!)
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Pristine Audio (?!)
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Pristine Audio (?!)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] Pristine Audio (?!)

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]