Re: [ARSCLIST] Hatto, etc.

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Hatto, etc.
From: Don Cox <doncox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 15:46:20 +0000
Comments: To: ARSCLIST@sun8.LOC.GOV
In-reply-to: <000701c7f7a4$d6b91720$89d3644c@DELLDOWNSTAIRS>
List-archive: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>
List-help: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV?body=INFO ARSCLIST>
List-owner: <mailto:ARSCLIST-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-subscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
Message-id: <yam10849.1003.156787808@smtp.ntlworld.com>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>

On 15/09/07, Steven Smolian wrote:


>> I really wish there was some way to learn more about these records.
> 
> MOST OF THIS RERSEARCH HAS TO BE DONE FROM THE BOTTOM-UP. THAT
> INCLUDES USING TWIN TURNTABLES AND TRYING TO SYNCHRONIZE POSSIBLE
> PERFORMANCES WITH THE ONE IN QUESTION.
>> 

Isn't it much easier to digitise the records and compare waveforms in an
audio mixer program? 

Regards
-- 
Don Cox
doncox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Hatto, etc.
  - From: Aaron Levinson

References:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Hatto, etc.
  - From: Steven Smolian

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Hatto, etc.
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Hatto, etc.
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Hatto, etc.
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Hatto, etc.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] Hatto, etc.

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]