Re: [ARSCLIST] BWF RF64

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] BWF RF64
From: Parker Dinkins <parker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 18:45:08 -0500
Comments: To: EricJ@TheAudioArchive.com
In-reply-to: <00fc01c7ef37$958b69d0$6b01a8c0@Studgitator>
List-archive: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>
List-help: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV?body=INFO ARSCLIST>
List-owner: <mailto:ARSCLIST-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-subscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
Message-id: <C3035834.2B480%parker@masterdigital.com>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>
Thread-index: AcfvTaAL3qShP1tAEdyM4QAWy4RdmQ==
Thread-topic: [ARSCLIST] BWF RF64
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.3.6.070618

on 9/4/07 4:07 PM US/Central, Eric Jacobs at EricJ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
wrote:

> Is anyone using BWF RF64 (RIFF 64 chunk) for large archival BWF files
> (larger than 4GB)?

Yes, we've even used with 24/96 stereo for long radio programs.

--
Parker Dinkins
MasterDigital Corporation
Audio Restoration + CD Mastering
http://masterdigital.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] BWF RF64 (aka MBWF)
  - From: Eric Jacobs

References:
- [ARSCLIST] BWF RF64
  - From: Eric Jacobs

Prev by Date: [ARSCLIST] BWF RF64
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] speaking of turntables ...
Previous by thread: [ARSCLIST] BWF RF64
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] BWF RF64 (aka MBWF)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] BWF RF64

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]