[Table of Contents]


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ARSCLIST] OK - Does Anyone Know More About This?



I should have been more specific about my last statement. No commercial-release music that I know of was recorded on 3-track until 1955. I had heard rumor about the LA amateur recordist and also Bill Cara I think made some 3-track recordings of live music as early as 1953 or 1954, but his were also amateur recordings (Richard Hess will correct me if I'm wrong but I believe Bill Cara's rig was ultra-rare 3-track quarter-inch). If I recall the history as told by Ampex veterans to the Ampex List, Capitol Studios in L.A. got the first 3-track 300 decks, and David Sarser in NY got a custom 350 fitted for 1/2" 3-track in NY. Mercury started 3-track sessions in late 1955, RCA I think started around the same time but it might have been a couple months earlier. RCA began 2-track stereo recording in 1953 if memory serves correctly, but it might have been early 1954.

Aside from the added cost and complexity, another reason 3-track playback gear was never tried for consumers is that by the time stereo reel tapes were first hitting the market in early 1956, making stacked-track heads for 1/4" tape was a pretty new thing. Ampex spent a lot of time in the early days making sure that Magnecorder's stagger-tracks system died a quick death. Narrow track heads weren't perfected for another two or three years, for quarter-track 2-sided tapes (which was a way to fit a whole LP's time on a tape and keep costs low enough so there was a market). When quarter-track came out, 2-channel stereo was well-established. Ampex initially made a retrofit for the first-generation "A" series consumer decks, and the subsequent 900 series decks had a movable play head where the 2-track gaps would move up on the tape to align with quarter-track tracks 1 and 3. The A series decks only recorded half-track mono; the 900 series recorded 2-track stereo. The first quarter-track decks from Ampex were the 1200 series, 1959 or 1960. They were 900 decks with quarter-track erase, record and play heads. The competition was always in the same market, and quarter-track was set as the consumer reel format by 1960 or so. Then we start getting into cartridges, Muntz 4-track and then Lear 8-track, etc.

-- Tom Fine
----- Original Message ----- From: "Steven Smolian" <smolians@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 10:12 PM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] OK - Does Anyone Know More About This?



There were experimental recordings made live of the Los Angeles Philharmonic on 3 channel Ampexes in the early 50s. I appraised a collection of the tapes, then stored under Hollywood Bowl. They were made by a wealthy hobbiest with the required permissions.

At some point, they were mixed down to 2 tracks, rather badly, as I recall, by the Bowl's electrician or something.

It's been many years since I did the appraisal. I can't recall the donor's name but he had made his fortune making clear nosecones for B-17s. Truman had written a letter to Petrillo for him to get union permission. I recall the recorder fellow telling me that they has the devil's own time setting up a strong center channel and and left and right side channels, all on one T shaped tree, and setting the mikes up to eliminate phasing problems.

I don't reclall the year they were made, but some tapes were conducted by Van Beinum.

I think the tapes went to the LA Phil. That's one of the major orchestras that was disinterested in useing its sound archives for fund raising (Pittsburg was anothr.) I know, because, while I was gathering, restoring and preserving materials for the New York Philharmonic Archive, I approached the LA Phil. I was told, in a very snotty way, that they could get all the money they needed from the film comminity. The implication was clear that New York was prostituting itself by having radiothons and selling premium LP sets. Since I was the archives' recording engineer and saw the first six ot seven sets through the record production process, I'm afraid I took this rather badly. Without those sets, we wouldn't have the incandescent Mahler 5 with Mitropoulos, the finale of which is as great a performance of anything as exists on record. Hurrah for the New York Philharmoic. Phooey on the Los Angeles' administration, at least that in the front office in the mid 70s.

Steve Smolian

----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Fine" <tflists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 8:40 PM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] OK - Does Anyone Know More About This?



Hi David:

Of course I can't put my hand on any of Bert's articles about those days right now (I believe he wrote about it some for Radio & TV News in the 50's and then later at greater length in Audio magazine in the 70's), but I think he was running snippets of the sessions onto tapes, experimenting with mic placement and maybe levels or the like. The Magnecorder, I think, used 7" reels, so if he was going at 15IPS he'd have to be changing tapes frequently. He may have been told to only record X minutes of any session but I'm not sure about that because I was under the impression that he was pretty much given carte blanche. I imagine it was a trip working with Stokowski in what was by far the highest-fidelity stereo medium yet at that point. Stokowski was veteran of Bell Labs stereo disk recordings in the 30's and Fantasound optical recordings, so I imagine he was tough customer about what sounded right from tape. And he and Bert worked together again when Stokowski recorded for Everest.

Speaking of Bert Whyte, he wrote a really nice column after he was introduced to Mercury 3-channel stereo:
http://www.wendycarlos.com/surround/surround6.html#column2
Fact correction: the listening venue was actually Fine Sound Studio C at 711 5th Ave. (today it's the Coke building, owned by Coca-Cola Co.). I agree with Bert -- there should have been a 3-channel consumer medium but it was thought just too complex and expensive at the time (and, based on how well quad and later SACD did in the marketplace, perhaps the thinking was right -- plus no one had any ideas about a 3-channel disk medium). One other interesting thing -- Ampex was able to build 3-channel tape machines as early as 9/53 (Ross Snyder of Ampex wrote an article for International Sound Technician magazine that showed pictures of a 3-track headstack and described 3-track magnetic recording on 1/2" tape), but no one started recording music in 3-tracks until 1955.


-- Tom Fine

----- Original Message ----- From: "David Lewis" <davlew@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 7:08 PM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] OK - Does Anyone Know More About This?



Tom,


Thanks for this very helpful answer. That basically answers my question,
although in this case:

I'm not sure how much tape Bert ran that day but one would think that if a
tape of the piece you cite existed it would have been issued on that CD.

There may be hope. "Tabor" is tagged on to the end of a disc that otherwise
consists of a Stokowski concert in stereo from Detroit, 11/20/1952,
consisting of Jacob Avshalomov's The Taking of T'ung Kuan with the
Tchaikovsky Symphony No. 5. It was included, in part, as the recording was
at one time mis-marked as being by Stokowski, but was matched to the Kubelik
performance through comparison. Certainly if there are other bits and pieces
of Ma vlast in stereo, they would not have fit on the 65 minute CD.

Not that I would throw away my Mercury of "From Bohemia's Woods and Fields;"
it's still great. But it would be interesting to hear Whyte's recording if
anything survives of it.

David N. Lewis
Assistant Classical Editor, All Music Guide

"To collect [folksongs] without a phonograph - until there's something
better - is mad and criminal." - Percy Grainger, 1907

-----Original Message-----
From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
[mailto:ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tom Fine
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 6:07 PM
To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] OK - Does Anyone Know More About This?

Hi David:

As widely written about through the years by Bert Whyte, my father took him
along on some of the
early Mercury single-mic sessions and Bert was allowed and indeed encouraged
by those present to
make experimental binaural (what 2-mic recordings were called back then
although the definition of
binaural has been refined to mean something else now) recordings on his
Magnacorder staggered-head
machine. I think Bert used a pair of U-47's but I might be wrong. Apparently
the copyright owner of
these sessions, Universal and/or the CSO, is OK with the CD release of some
of Bert's tapes (at
least I haven't read about any copyright-infringement actions). The
Stokowski recordings are the
Bell Labs disk recordings from the 1930's, which I believe are PD but might
not be because an
elaborate agreement was made between Bell Labs and the Stokowski family and
the Philadephia
Orchestra when Bell Labs issued their LPs in the late 70's (this according
to the original mastering
engineer; I did some investigating about reissuing a CD from those master
tapes under AES auspices
but too many rights issues involved). Again, I would assume the issuer of
the current CD cleared all
these rights or they would have been sued.

I'm not sure how much tape Bert ran that day but one would think that if a
tape of the piece you
cite existed it would have been issued on that CD.

-- Tom Fine

----- Original Message ----- From: "David Lewis" <davlew@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 5:00 PM
Subject: [ARSCLIST] OK - Does Anyone Know More About This?



According to Music & Arts' "Stokowski and Kubelik conduct Experimental
Stereo Recordings from 1952" (MUA 1190) contains an experimental stereo
recording, made by Bert Whyte, during the sessions for Rafael Kubelik's
Mercury recording of Ma vlast. The piece is "Tabor," and annotator Edward
Johnson writes "Other such experiments from THAT and later Kubelik/CSO
sessions are known to exist but this is the first to be released..."

What "other such experiments" from this session "[is] known to exist?" I'm
particularly - strongly, in fact - interested in any stereo takes of the
movement "From Bohemia's Woods and Fields" from this December 1952
session.
Even in mono, this performance is positively electrifying.

David N. Lewis
Assistant Classical Editor, All Music Guide

"To collect [folksongs] without a phonograph - until there's something
better - is mad and criminal." - Percy Grainger, 1907



--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.15/848 - Release Date: 6/13/2007 12:50 PM





[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]