[Table of Contents]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ARSCLIST] Whacky-Packia outed for what it is -- Amateur Hour in Siberia

David Lennick wrote:

Don Cox wrote:

On 22/03/07, David Lennick wrote:

 Has Wikipedia ever retracted

Frequently, I think. Isn't the whole point that it can be edited and
updated continually, unlike a printed book?

And isn't the whole point of my rant (resisting the temptation to type this next phrase in upper case) the fact that *anyone* can amend *anything* in any Wikipedia article, with nobody questioning the amendment until someone notices the inaccuracy? As far as I'm concerned, that renders it potentially 100% unreliable. If it leads you to a source that you trust, well and good. But you could have found that source yourself.



BTW, this Wikipedia topic made it to the six o'clock news last night on
CBS in the US.
In the final "leave em feeling good/warm and fuzzy/ironic questioning" slot.

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]