Re: [ARSCLIST] Curious--was: well, this might <snip>

[David Lennick <dlennick@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Steven C. Barr(x) wrote:
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> > > So, if one wanted to do the "Complete Capitol Discography" (hint hint
> > > hint...) you would be the party to whom one would inquire...
> > >
> > > Steven C. Barr
> > >
> > >  
> > *******
> >
> > But didn't Ruppli do just that?
> > Mal
> Dunno...he's done so many, where ledgers had survived. RR was running
> a numeric list when my sub ran out...no idea how far they got!
>
> However, we in Canada had our own numbering system from c.1949 to
> the mid-fifties...confusingly, it used the same "C-" prefix as
> did our Columbias...
>
> Steven C. Barr
>                          

Not so surprising since the same plant made 'em. And while the Canadian Capitol 
78s from that period are quite distinct from Columbia 78s, except for the odd 
instance where a Capitol 78 was a laminated pressing (I've seen examples), 
their LPs are indistinguishable between 1949 and 1954.

dl