Re: [ARSCLIST] DAT Archival Housing

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] DAT Archival Housing
From: Karl Miller <karl.miller@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 06:43:57 -0800
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
In-reply-to: <C1FD27B0.26CCF%parker@masterdigital.com>
List-archive: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>
List-help: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV?body=INFO ARSCLIST>
List-owner: <mailto:ARSCLIST-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-subscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
Message-id: <843081.60787.qm@web81604.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>

Reading the note below...
   
  I have several 32kHz DATs which sound distorted. They will not play on at all on my Panasonic machine, but do play (with distortion at peaks) on my Tascam. Is it possible that some other machine might play them without distortion?
   
  Karl

Parker Dinkins <parker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
    One of the problems with DATs is that there is no one machine that can play
all formats. For example, there was the 32kHz LP format (12 bit) that cannot
be played on some 32kHz capable machines.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] DAT Archival Housing
  - From: Parker Dinkins
- Re: [ARSCLIST] DAT Archival Housing
  - From: David Lennick
- Re: [ARSCLIST] DAT Archival Housing
  - From: Richard L. Hess

References:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] DAT Archival Housing
  - From: Parker Dinkins

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] DAT Archival Housing
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] DAT Archival Housing
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] DAT Archival Housing
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] DAT Archival Housing
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] DAT Archival Housing

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]