Re: [ARSCLIST] FLAC?

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] FLAC?
From: Karl Miller <lyaa071@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 10:42:57 -0600
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
In-reply-to: <23737437.1913321161957950221.JavaMail.servlet@perfora>
List-archive: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>
List-help: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV?body=INFO ARSCLIST>
List-owner: <mailto:ARSCLIST-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-subscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
Message-id: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0611011041550.1148@larry.cc.utexas.edu>
References: <23737437.1913321161957950221.JavaMail.servlet@perfora>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>

On Fri, 27 Oct 2006, Bob Olhsson wrote:

> BWF wav was the product of research by the EBU to find or create a standard audio
file format for broadcasters to exchange. It's the only standardized,
non-prporiatary container and can be expected to remain with us for many years due
to the financial value of many recordings stored in the BWF format.

I guess it is is the last of that sentence that concerns me...

Karl

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] FLAC?
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] The Incompetence at ENHS
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] FLAC?
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Effect of vibrations on audio tape
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] FLAC?

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]