Re: [ARSCLIST] FLAC?

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] FLAC?
From: "Milan P. Milovanovic" <mijel@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 10:32:25 +0200
Comments: To: ARSCLIST@sun8.LOC.GOV
List-archive: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>
List-help: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV?body=INFO ARSCLIST>
List-owner: <mailto:ARSCLIST-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-subscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
Message-id: <002c01c6fa6b$99b0e6f0$e501f0d5@tekt06314ef79c>
References: <123301c6f9ea$baae5ad0$0200a8c0@thetick>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>

Foobar2000 supports playing of almost every lossless format, in higher resolution (I tried and sucessfully used FLAC and Wavpack with 24/96 stereo).

Milan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Eric Jacobs" <ericj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 7:09 PM Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] FLAC?

Now, if only all consumer playback hardware/software would support formats with higher resolution than 16/44.1. I would certainly like that, especially if I could run 24/96 WAVE files in iTunes, Windows Media Player, etc.

References:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] FLAC?
  - From: Eric Jacobs

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] FLAC?
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] FLAC?
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] FLAC?
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] FLAC?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] FLAC?

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]