Re: [ARSCLIST] Dynamic-frequency Range

[Mike Richter <mrichter@xxxxxxx>]

Karl Miller wrote:

> For me, the major problem with historically informed performances is that,
> while they might play on period instruments, keep the size of the ensemble
> historically correct, use the original metronome markings, etc...they
> can't replicate playing techniques that are no longer taught...things like
> the use of rubato within a phrase without losing the overall beat,
> measured portamento, etc. I wonder what Beethoven would have thought of
> the Nikisch recording of the 5th or d'Albert's broadcast of the Emperor.

I've not much to add since we are in agreement. <G>

There is another factor in questioning the validity of HIP: the 
audience. Bach's audience had never heard Mozart; Mozart's had not heard 
Beethoven; u.s.w.

Consider the over-the-top performance of Vivaldi's "Four Seasons" in 
Phase-4 sound under Leopold Stokowski. I wonder how close the impact of 
his summer thunderstorm today is to the effect Vivaldi's orchestra in 
that music had on his audience.

We know that music we hear today as mellifluous and tranquil was 
considered disruptive, dissonant and abhorrent when composed. The music 
hasn't changed; performance practice has only moderate impact; but the 
audience is different.

Mike
--
mrichter@xxxxxxx
http://www.mrichter.com/