First of all, i mean not to steal
Richard H's thunder, as he knows quite
a bit more about this subject than me.
That said, it strikes me that the solution
proposed here only accounts for splices
*so* sticky as to be identifiable by touch alone.
Thus allowing selections exhibiting less
ridiculously obvious stages of hyrolysis
to miss the boat.
Quoting Tom Fine <tflists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
Guys, this is not all correct. Wait for Richard Hess to chime in.
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Lennick" <dlennick@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, October 08, 2006 10:38 PM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Tape baking question
> That was sort of what I expected the answer to be.
> "joe@xxxxxxxxxxx" wrote:
>> If memory serves, baking is known to be detrimental to some types of
>> tape, so I'd suggest separating them out as best you can, bake,
>> reassemble and Xfer.
>> Joe Salerno
>> Industrial Video Services
>> PO Box 273405
>> Houston Texas 77277-3405
>> David Lennick wrote:
>> > Here's one for the team. Let's say you have a reel made up of
>> > pieces of tape, either a compilation or a master or just something
where it was
>> > convenient to group similar pieces of material together. Let's say
SOME of the
>> > selections are recorded on 176, some on 456, some on god knows
>> > course, now you have a tape that has sticky shed on only some of the
>> > you bake the whole thing or try and remove only the portions that
>> > treatment and bake them?
>> > --Stuck
Archivist for Audio Collections
Hoover Institution Archives
Stanford, CA 94305-6010