Re: [ARSCLIST] ET groove cutting ( was "More about ET preservation", was "Comparable collections anywhere?")

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] ET groove cutting ( was "More about ET preservation", was "Comparable collections anywhere?")
From: "Scott D. Smith" <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 18:26:12 -0500
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
In-reply-to: <4509C0B8.60604@audio-restoration.com>
List-archive: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>
List-help: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV?body=INFO ARSCLIST>
List-owner: <mailto:ARSCLIST-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-subscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
Message-id: <4509E514.9090503@chicagoaudio.com>
Organization: Chicago Audio Works, Inc.
References: <046501c6d762$9825d1a0$0200a8c0@thetick> <45088588.5030801@chicagoaudio.com> <4509C0B8.60604@audio-restoration.com>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax)

From Graham Newton:

<snip> You must separate a pressing from a lacquer (also referred to as a soft-cut, instantaneous cut, or incorrectly as an "acetate"... there is NO acetate in them, but that is a whole 'nother story.)

Sorry, I meant my comments to pertain primarily to the original cut discs (which, as you point out, have no acetate). Of course, any problem that is exhibited in a master laquer will be carried over to the subsequent manufactured parts as well, if the laquer is destined for pressing.

Just got carried away...

--Scott

References:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] ET groove cutting ( was "More about ET preservation", was "Comparable collections anywhere?")
  - From: Eric Jacobs
- Re: [ARSCLIST] ET groove cutting ( was "More about ET preservation", was "Comparable collections anywhere?")
  - From: Scott D. Smith
- Re: [ARSCLIST] ET groove cutting ( was "More about ET preservation", was "Comparable collections anywhere?")
  - From: Graham Newton

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] ^ Letter on British Copyright Term Extension
Next by Date: [ARSCLIST] XERF--was: lacquer discs was [ARSCLIST] Comparable collections anywhere?
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] ET groove cutting ( was "More about ET preservation", was "Comparable collections anywhere?")
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] lacquer discs was [ARSCLIST] Comparable collections anywhere?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] ET groove cutting ( was "More about ET preservation", was "Comparable collections anywhere?")

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]