[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ARSCLIST] Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???)
Along these lines, I use a similar device made by KAB, which is about $
1,200.
The chain also includes a Klark Teknik graphic equalizer.
Steve Smolian
----- Original Message -----
From: "Parker Dinkins" <parker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, August 27, 2006 1:01 AM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's
can do???)
Every project is different, and there are appropriate tools for each
situation. It's very subjective. However, there's nothing special about
needing to de-click a phonograph record.
If you saw somewhere that a phono preamp sounds a lot better, then I have a
great solution for you: http://masterdigital.com/elberg/
The choice of tools depends on your particular situation.
---
Parker Dinkins
MasterDigital Corporation
CD Mastering + Audio Restoration
http://masterdigital.com
on 8/26/06 8:36 PM US/Central, Lou Judson at loujudson@xxxxxxx wrote:
But this does not answer how well the curve translates. Last time I saw
it discussed, the conclusion was it sounds a lot better in the pre, not
the computer... ignoring the special case of declicking, of course.
Lou Judson ? Intuitive Audio
415-883-2689
On Aug 26, 2006, at 6:06 PM, Parker Dinkins wrote:
Does anyone have experience transferring LPs flat and then applying EQ
in
the computer?
Yes. Some people believe that computer based de-clickers operate best
this
way, i.e. with no high end roll-off until after the de-clicking process.
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.6/428 - Release Date: 8/25/2006