Re: [ARSCLIST] .BWF implementation

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] .BWF implementation
From: Bob Olhsson <olh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 10:12:21 -0400
Comments: To: ARSCLIST@loc.gov
List-archive: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>
List-help: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV?body=INFO ARSCLIST>
List-owner: <mailto:ARSCLIST-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-subscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
Message-id: <13674235.1048911155391940728.JavaMail.servlet@perfora>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>

Kevin wrote:
>The fact that "it is the ONLY international standard audio file format" is 
>meaningless if manufacturers don't support it.

True however in this case, and unlike most manufacturer trade group standards, they have a compelling financial incentive. Most of the biggest players do support it because they want  EBU member purchase orders. Even Sony asks "how high" when it comes to the EBU.
-- 
Bob Olhsson Audio Mastery, Nashville TN
Mastering, Audio for Picture, Mix Evaluation and Quality Control
Over 40 years making people sound better than they ever imagined!
615.385.8051    http://www.hyperback.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] .BWF implementation
  - From: Steven Smolian

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] LP RECORD STORAGE - plywood/particle board
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] .BWF implementation
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] .BWF implementation
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] .BWF implementation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] .BWF implementation

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]