Re: [ARSCLIST] Cassette obsolescence - digitizing standards

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Cassette obsolescence - digitizing standards
From: Lou Judson <loujudson@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 09:24:30 -0800
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
In-reply-to: <7.0.1.0.2.20060220105506.0790d810@richardhess.com>
Message-id: <229f9f1b18fc8caf59fc82a5c6c396c9@mac.com>
References: <F90EDDE65901DA11A59500508B44DD5F3CCF85@SPARMAIL1> <7.0.1.0.2.20060220105506.0790d810@richardhess.com>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>

What about using 24 bit at 44.1 so that any noise reduction or processing done later is higher definition?

Lou Judson • Intuitive Audio
415-883-2689

On Feb 20, 2006, at 8:21 AM, Richard L. Hess wrote:

It's easy to say 96/24 for everything, but if you can put 3x the amount of stuff in the same bucket at 44.1/16 and you haven't lost anything, why wouldn't you do that?

It's a balancing act. The cassette is the weakest link in the chain.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Cassette obsolescence - digitizing standards
  - From: Steven Smolian
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Cassette obsolescence - digitizing standards
  - From: Richard L. Hess
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Cassette obsolescence - digitizing standards
  - From: Mike Richter

References:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Cassette obsolescence
  - From: Geeta Jatania
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Cassette obsolescence - digitizing standards
  - From: Richard L. Hess

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Cassette obsolescence - digitizing standards
Next by Date: [ARSCLIST] Fwd: 17.552, Media: 6500-year-old voices recorded in pottery!
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Cassette obsolescence - digitizing standards
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Cassette obsolescence - digitizing standards
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] Cassette obsolescence - digitizing standards

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]