Re: [ARSCLIST] Cassette obsolescence - digitizing standards

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Cassette obsolescence - digitizing standards
From: "Richard L. Hess" <arclists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 13:19:47 -0500
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
In-reply-to: <229f9f1b18fc8caf59fc82a5c6c396c9@mac.com>
Message-id: <7.0.1.0.2.20060220131813.04468310@richardhess.com>
References: <F90EDDE65901DA11A59500508B44DD5F3CCF85@SPARMAIL1> <7.0.1.0.2.20060220105506.0790d810@richardhess.com> <229f9f1b18fc8caf59fc82a5c6c396c9@mac.com>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>

At 12:24 PM 2/20/2006, Lou Judson wrote:

What about using 24 bit at 44.1 so that any noise reduction or processing done later is higher definition?

I do that - yes, another option that adds 50% to the storage requirements. I often do the transfers at 44.1/24 and then after normalizing the levels output the file to 44.1/16.

Tape Restoration Seminar: MAY 9-12, 2006; details at Web site. Richard L. Hess email: richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Aurora, Ontario, Canada (905) 713 6733 1-877-TAPE-FIX Detailed contact information: http://www.richardhess.com/tape/contact.htm

References:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Cassette obsolescence
  - From: Geeta Jatania
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Cassette obsolescence - digitizing standards
  - From: Richard L. Hess
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Cassette obsolescence - digitizing standards
  - From: Lou Judson

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Cassette obsolescence
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Cassette obsolescence - digitizing standards
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Cassette obsolescence - digitizing standards
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Cassette obsolescence - digitizing standards
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] Cassette obsolescence - digitizing standards

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]