Re: [ARSCLIST] Dynagroove, was Record tracking

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Dynagroove, was Record tracking
From: phillip holmes <insuranceman@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 22:40:04 -0600
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
Message-id: <004001c63057$8ecbd990$6401a8c0@yourxhtr8hvc4p>
References: <20060213025359.75AB6618FBB@mail12-ash.bigfish.com> <43EFFA3F.13E06EB6@sympatico.ca> <6.2.3.4.2.20060212194901.00f6e920@pop.nwnexus.com>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>

I've never heard of this before. Wow. Do you know of any specific pressings? Phillip ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Ross" >

During that period, US Columbia discovered that they could substitute cellophane (or some other clear film) for vinyl. They were buying huge rolls of the stuff, without ever explaining to the supplier what it was being used for. I don' think it was the same stuff they used for shrink-wrap, but some other type of non-pertroleum-based film.

They claimed it made no difference to the sound of the disks.

John Ross

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Dynagroove, was Record tracking
  - From: John Ross

References:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Dynagroove, was Record tracking
  - From: Jeffrey Kane
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Dynagroove, was Record tracking
  - From: David Lennick
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Dynagroove, was Record tracking
  - From: John Ross

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Dynagroove, was Record tracking
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Dynagroove, was Record tracking
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Dynagroove, was Record tracking
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Dynagroove, was Record tracking
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] Dynagroove, was Record tracking

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]