Re: [ARSCLIST] Record tracking,and ageing, was De-static question

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Record tracking,and ageing, was De-static question
From: Michael Fitzgerald <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 18:27:43 -0500
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
In-reply-to: <43EFC07B.E82C23FD@sympatico.ca>
Message-id: <6.2.3.4.0.20060212182603.05695820@jazzdiscography.com>
References: <20060212163454.28A424DC203@mail5-ash.bigfish.com> <000701c6300b$2bc76860$c85daf45@DELLDOWNSTAIRS> <43EFB665.D401BB4C@sympatico.ca> <001601c63026$199196a0$6c01a8c0@TOMOFFICE> <43EFC07B.E82C23FD@sympatico.ca>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>

At 06:10 PM 2/12/2006, you wrote:

MCA Canada once sent a pressing of "Tommy" (or maybe JC Superstar) into the stores, minus center holes.

Yeah, but just think if you found one - talk about pristine!

Mike

mike at JazzDiscography.com http://www.JazzDiscography.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Record tracking,and ageing, was De-static question
  - From: David Lennick
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Record tracking,and ageing, was De-static question
  - From: steven c

References:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] De-static question
  - From: Jeffrey Kane
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Record tracking,and ageing, was De-static question
  - From: Steven Smolian
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Record tracking,and ageing, was De-static question
  - From: David Lennick
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Record tracking,and ageing, was De-static question
  - From: Tom Fine
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Record tracking,and ageing, was De-static question
  - From: David Lennick