Re: [ARSCLIST] CD Longevity (and cataloging)

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] CD Longevity (and cataloging)
From: Karl Miller <lyaa071@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 09:16:30 -0600
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
In-reply-to: <43D3A8B6.5070104@cpl.net>
Message-id: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0601250914450.13046@larry.cc.utexas.edu>
References: <!&!AAAAAAAAAAAYAAAAAAAAAHRga3jFKDlFmb/EUhW0gnrCgAAAEAAAAFEYlDnaAp1Boch/GslqL18BAAAAAA==@scarlet.be> <43D3A8B6.5070104@cpl.net>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>

On Sun, 22 Jan 2006, Mike Richter wrote:

> Note that another popular term, "Music Disc" is imprecise as well. There
> is no constraint on a company labelling its product 'music disc' or
> 'audio disc' or 'gold disc' or what it will - except where the term is
> controlled as is "Digital Audio".

And speaking of imprecise use of terms...one of my favorites from the 300
field in the MARC record  "sound disc"

Karl

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] CD Longevity (and cataloging)
  - From: Steven Smolian

References:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] CD Longevity
  - From: Jos Van Dyck
- Re: [ARSCLIST] CD Longevity
  - From: Mike Richter

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] CD Longevity (was Vinegar syndrome audio tapes (now MP3)
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Brunswick Records rights/Universal
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] CD Longevity
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] CD Longevity (and cataloging)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] CD Longevity (and cataloging)

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]