Re: [ARSCLIST] Memorex CDs and more!

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Memorex CDs and more!
From: Lou Judson <loujudson@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 09:32:21 -0800
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
In-reply-to: <00f801c61d74$67d8a160$0f57fea9@interlinks.net>
Message-id: <d6ca9f156cc6f59939da1f69202dc0b7@mac.com>
References: <s3ce105d.055@gwia201.syr.edu> <Pine.GSO.4.58.0601180954020.14735@larry.cc.utexas.edu> <002401c61c56$bc927d80$6701a8c0@TOMOFFICE> <Pine.GSO.4.58.0601181213540.9238@larry.cc.utexas.edu> <7e0157b6c3321fa07964106b1c5a65da@mac.com> <00f801c61d74$67d8a160$0f57fea9@interlinks.net>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>

Yes but player pianos have nothing to do with Memorex CDs. I don't expect to change people's minds, just notice the illogic of it.

Lou Judson • Intuitive Audio
415-883-2689

On Jan 19, 2006, at 7:48 PM, steven c wrote:


It would be appreciated if the subject line changed along with the
discussion....

Logical enough...but when I have suggested that in similar cases on
other e-lists, I always get upset replies from folks who file
threads and e-mails by subject, and can't keep their archives
straight when subject entries vary!

Steven C. Barr

References:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Memorex CDs and more!
  - From: Robert Hodge
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Memorex CDs and more!
  - From: Karl Miller
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Memorex CDs and more!
  - From: Tom Fine
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Memorex CDs and more!
  - From: Karl Miller
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Memorex CDs and more!
  - From: Lou Judson
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Memorex CDs and more!
  - From: steven c

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer?
Next by Date: [ARSCLIST] Records wanted
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Memorex CDs and more!
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Memorex CDs and more!
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] Memorex CDs and more!

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]