[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ARSCLIST] proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer?
- To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer?
- From: "Bewley, Nigel" <Nigel.Bewley@xxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 16:23:51 -0000
- Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>, ARSCLIST@sun8.LOC.GOV
- Importance: normal
- Message-id: <677D62401522F545852FB4BCEBF44A3001BCEA3A@w2k-lonex2.ad.bl.uk>
- Priority: normal
- Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>
- Thread-index: AcYd3Uxo8V2Vx20YQbyEWsqobW9xAQAADAKg
- Thread-topic: [ARSCLIST] proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer?
EIGHT rpm? Slow Speakin' Southern Folks?? :)
Greetings from London. It's mild and dry here.
Nigel Bewley
British Library Sound Archive
**************************************************************************
Experience the British Library online at www.bl.uk
Help the British Library conserve the world's knowledge. Adopt a Book. www.bl.uk/adoptabook
The Library's St Pancras site is WiFI - enabled
**************************************************************************
The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this e-mail and notify the postmaster@xxxxx : The contents of this e-mail must not be disclosed or copied without the sender's consent.
The statements and opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the British Library. The British Library does not take any responsibility for the views of the author.
**************************************************************************