[Table of Contents]


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ARSCLIST] proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer?



One could adapt "we're rolling" to "we're spinning." I still say "we're rolling" whether it's digital or analog media.

----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert Hodge" <rjhodge@xxxxxxx>
To: <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 2:17 PM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer?



I have always liked to use " SPEED " to indicate recording. Probably has to do with NAGRA pilot tone flag indicators and VTR lockup.


Bob Hodge

loujudson@xxxxxxx 1/19/2006 1:39 PM >>>
...or "we are rolling" in the studio... "Disc is Spinning" just doesn't
have the same ring.

During intermission at a live show, someone came up to me once and
said, Wow, that was really great! Did you tape it?

Me: Well, we got it on 16 tracks of Protools and a 24 bit hard drive
backup...

Him: But, but you DID tape it didn't you???!?

me: Yes sir, we got it all...

Lou Judson * Intuitive Audio
415-883-2689

On Jan 19, 2006, at 9:17 AM, David Lennick wrote:

Which is still not going to stop the general public from calling them
"acetates", any more than they'll stop referring to "Blue Wax
Columbias",
matrix numbers "in the wax" etc.

dl


[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]